Legal Opinion

Olson v. Augsberger

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1962PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

At the outset we point out this appeal is properly taken only from the judgment. The order for judgment and the order denying the motion to review and modify the judgment are not appealable orders. In Bielski v. Schulze, supra, we determined the amount of contribution between joint tort-feasors having a common liability was to be determined in proportion to the causal negligence attributable to each in the verdict. The new rule was applied retrospectively except in three classes of cases. Generally when a court overrules a doctrine of common law, the new rule of the decision applies…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. McConville v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Kojis v. Doctors HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Heritage Mutual Insurance v. Sheboygan CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Doheny v. CrawfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Scaria v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Colby v. Columbia CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Harmann Ex Rel. Bertz v. HadleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Widell v. Holy Trinity Catholic ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Marshall v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API