Randolph v. County of Stanislaus
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County refusing to issue an injunction. W. M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ELLISON, P. J.,
pro tem.—The plaintiffs, as taxpayers, bring this action to obtain an injunction restraining the board of supervisors of Stanislaus County from calling an election to elect directors of a proposed public utility district, known as the Stanislaus Public Utility District, and from expending the moneys of said county for holding said election.
The court, after trial, refused to issue an injunction, and entered judgment for the defendants for their costs. The plaintiffs appeal.
The said public utility district is described as being “composed of all the territory within the Modesto…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ferris v. CooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Miller v. GrunskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. Bd. of Supervisors of Shasta CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Manson v. KoppikusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by6 opinions
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Drumhiller v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Blackman v. StoneDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1936
- City of Coronado v. SextonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Purviance v. ComptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.