In re MH 2009-001264

MEMORANDUM DECISION

WINTHROP, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant seeks reversal of the superi- or court’s order for involuntary mental health treatment. He argues that the superior court was required to engage in a colloquy with him personally to determine whether he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to have the physicians who evaluated him testify in person. As support for his argument, he also contends that the evaluating physicians’ credentials were not satisfactorily established. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Appellant suffers from paranoid…