Legal Opinion
In Re Gencor Industries, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided August 28, 2002No. 00-03597-6J1, 00-03598-6J1, 00-03599-6J1, 00-03601-6J1, 00-03602-6J1, 00-03604-6J1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON FEE ENHANCEMENT REQUESTED IN APPLICATION BY PACHULSKI, STANG, ZIEHL, YOUNG & JONES FOR FEE AUGMENTATION
KAREN S. JENNEMANN, Bankruptcy Judge.
This case came on for hearing on February 13, 2002, on the Supplemental Application by Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young & Jones for Fee Augmentation (Doc. No. 678) and the Oppositions filed by the Lender Group 1 as well as the United States Trustee (Doc. Nos. 693 and 697). The applicant, Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young & Jones, represents the debtor in these Chapter 11 cases. The debtor has paid all of Pachulski’s fees and costs…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Fleming Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- In Re Chewning & Frey Security, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
- In Re Channel Master Holdings, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2004
- In Re BuckridgeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2007
- In Re CarpenterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.