Legal Opinion
In Re Buckridge
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided March 12, 2007No. RS 04-17991 PCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PETER H. CARROLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
Reid & Hellyer (“R & H”), general counsel for the chapter 7 trustee, Robert S. Whitmore (“Whitmore”), seeks allowance of a “fee enhancement” in the amount of $34,779.20, which constitutes the entire surplus of estate funds that would otherwise be returned to the Debtor, Charles Russell Buckridge, Jr. (“Buckridge”) after the payment of allowed claims and administrative expenses in this case. Buckridge objects to the fee enhancement, claiming that R & H’s request for a “bonus” is not supported by the evidence and should be denied. At the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Las Vegas Monorail Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- In Re Radical Bunny, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2011
- Fann Contracting, Inc. v. ShapiroDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- In Re: East Coast Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2021