Holt Manufacturing Co. v. Strachan
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Whitman county, McCroskey, J., entered February 28, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an- action on promissory notes.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
Plaintiff and defendants had certain transactions running over a period of years, during which time two combined harvester and threshing machines were sold by plaintiff to defendants and for which notes were given. In June, 1911, plaintiff sold to defendants another combined machine for the sum of $3,575. For this, several notes were given, and $800 was credited upon the purchase price, and for which plaintiff took a one-half interest in the two machines previously sold. The last machine was returned in the fall of 1911, plaintiff says under an agreement and settlement, and defendants say…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Houser & Haines Manufacturing Co. v. McKayWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Babcock, Cornish & Co. v. UrquhartWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Gaffney v. MegrathWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Cushing v. HeustonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Thompson v. RhodehamelWashington Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. Aeronautical Industrial Dist. Lodge No. 751District Court, W.D. Washington · 1950
- Labor Hall Ass'n, Inc. v. DanielsenWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Berger Engineering Co. v. HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Lowenthal Co. v. McCormack Brothers Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
- Sussman v. Mitsui & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.