Legal Opinion

State v. Burbank

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 16, 1982No. 8228SC345PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

The defendant brings forth five assignments of error and makes three arguments on appeal.

I

Defendant first argues that the outcome of his trial was adversely affected by the District Attorney’s examination of a defense witness concerning his (the District Attorney’s) I.D. card which was not in evidence at the time; by the exhibition of the card to the jury during the trial; and by his showing the card to the jury during final argument.

*545Generally, documents must be admitted into evidence before they can be used to illustrate or clarify testimony. See State v. Rich, 13 N.C. App. 60,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. RichCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Whaley v. MarshburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API