State v. Burbank
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
The defendant brings forth five assignments of error and makes three arguments on appeal.
I
Defendant first argues that the outcome of his trial was adversely affected by the District Attorney’s examination of a defense witness concerning his (the District Attorney’s) I.D. card which was not in evidence at the time; by the exhibition of the card to the jury during the trial; and by his showing the card to the jury during final argument.
*545Generally, documents must be admitted into evidence before they can be used to illustrate or clarify testimony. See State v. Rich, 13 N.C. App. 60,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. RichCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Whaley v. MarshburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000