Legal Opinion

State v. Rich

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 713SC632PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Following the impaneling of the jury but prior to the presentation of any evidence, the defendant moved that a daily transcript of the testimony be had “because of the gravity of the case.” The court in denying this motion said, “I think the motion comes too late and should have been given time to get another reporter.” The defendant assigns as error the denial of this motion. Citing Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 100 L. Ed. 891, 76 S.Ct. 595 (1956), and Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 9 L. Ed. 2d 811, 83 S.Ct. 814 (1963), as authority, defendant contends that the denial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. WinfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. RouxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of BullaboughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. GodleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. BurbankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API