Legal Opinion

Whaley v. Marshburn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 1964No. 317PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cueiam.

The only evidence was that offered by plaintiffs. It was sufficient to require submission for jury determination of issues as to the alleged actionable negligence of defendant. In accordance with legal principles stated in Randall v. Rogers, ante, 544, 138 S.E. 2d 248, and cases cited, defendant’s motions for judgment of nonsuit were properly overruled.

Assignments of error relating to the charge have been carefully considered. Conceding technical error, when the charge is construed contextually, the assignments, in our view, do not show error of such prejudicial nature as to amount…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Randall v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Yates v. ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Poston v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. BurbankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Greene v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API