Legal Opinion

Bocalbos v. Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 2000No. 20719PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold in this appeal 1 from the March 14, 1997 “Second Amended Order and Decision” of the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (the Board) by Claimant-Appellant Mila Bocalbos (Bocalbos) that Bocal-bos was entitled to medical care, services, and supplies as “the nature of [her] injury require[d]” pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 386-21 (1985). Accordingly, while we respect the Board’s extensive efforts to resolve her claim, we conclude the Board’s denial of coverage for orthodontic 2 , orthopedic, 3 and prosthodontie 4 treatments claimed by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. FurutaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Granado v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Chung v. Animal Clinic, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HaydenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Korsak v. Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hoopai v. Civil Service CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Suzuki v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Cabatbat v. County of Hawai'i, Department of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API