Legal Opinion

Chung v. Animal Clinic, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1981No. 6696; CASE NO. AB 75-152 (75-4639)PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, J.

This is an appeal 1 brought by appellants Animal Clinic, Inc., and its insurance company from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (Board) granting appellee Dr. Nam Y. Chung compensation benefits under Hawaii’s Workers’ Compensation Law (chapter 386, Hawaii Revised Statutes).

On December 23, 1974, Dr. Chung suffered a heart attack after office hours while jogging around the Kalani High School track. At the time of his heart attack, Dr. Chung was employed as the president of Animal Clinic, Inc. He was also the sole director and sole…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Royal State National Insurance v. Labor & Industrial Relations Appeal BoardHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  2. DeFries v. ASSOCIATION OF OWNERS, 999 WILDERHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Dependents of Akamine v. Hawaiian Packing & Crating Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Leigh Aitchison, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. City of Phoenix v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Wallace J. Courtney v. Canyon Television & Appliance Rental, Inc., David Manthei, Mark Bartholomew and Matt PinkertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Korsak v. Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Tate v. GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lapinad v. Pacific Oldsmobile-GMC, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1988

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API