Legal Opinion

In re Guardianship of Stein

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2004No. 2004-0928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} Today this court must consider the narrow legal issue of whether the Summit County Probate Court exceeded its statutory authority when it appointed a guardian with the power to authorize the withdrawal of all life-sustaining support and treatment for Aiden Stein, an infant. Although the unique facts of this case are tragic and raise many issues, this case does not require us to decide whether either of Aiden Stein’s parents abused him or whether Aiden’s father, appellant Matthew Stein, is guilty of any criminal charges. It does not require us to decide whether it would be in Aiden’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. State v. HairstonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Florence v. ZitterOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State ex rel. Holwadel v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Ohio Legal Rights Service v. Buckeye Ranch, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
  4. In re Elianah T.-T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. In Re Elianah T.-T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API