In re Elianah T.-T.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether General Statutes § 17a-10 (c) 1 authorizes the petitioner, the Commissioner of Children and Families (commissioner), to vaccinate a child placed temporarily in her custody, over the objection of that child's parents. The respondents, Giordan T. and Nicanol T., appeal 2 from the decision of the trial court denying their motion seeking to prevent vaccination of their minor children, Elianah T.-T. and Nathaniel T.-T. On appeal, the respondents claim, inter alia, that § 17a-10 (c) does not authorize the commissioner to vaccinate the children over…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Doe v. MarselleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Gonzalez v. O. & G. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Conn. Hous. Fin. Auth. v. AlfaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Edge Fitness, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- In Re Elianah T.-T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. FratarcangeliConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.