Legal Opinion

Summit Avenue Building Co. v. Sanders

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoee, J.

It appears that on a former trial of the cause, defendants admitting the execution and existence of the contract sued on, bad pled by way of defense and offered evidence tending to sbow that there was a contemporaneous oral agreement and by virtue of wbicb defendants were to be released of the obligation of the written agreement if they failed in interesting certain designated persons in the enterprise witbin ten days from its date. Tbis claim having been established, there was judgment for defendants wbicb on appeal was set aside, the Court being of opinion that the parol evidence on which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. S. F. Bowser & Co. v. TarrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Pratt v. Chaffin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. White v. Fisheries Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Summit Avenue Building Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Blackstad Mercantile Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Bailey v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Roebuck v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Jobbers Overall Co. v. C. S. Hollister Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Lerner Shops v. . RosenthalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API