Legal Opinion

Roebuck v. . Carson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdbn, J.

If promissory, negotiable notes are duly executed and delivered, payable upon certain dates therein specified, can the maker thereof, as against the payee therein, set up a contemporaneous verbal agreement to the effect that the notes would not become payable until the death of the maker ?

The principle of law governing the controversy is thus stated in Fertilizer Co. v. Eason, 194 N. C., 244, 139 S. E., 376: “If a contract is not within the statute of frauds the parties may elect to put their agreement in writing, or to contract orally, or to reduce some of the terms to writing and leave the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Evans v. Freeman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Walker v. . VentersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Basnight v. Southern Jobbing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. National Bank v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Cherokee County v. . MeroneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. North Carolina National Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Whitehurst v. . Fcx Fruit and Vegetable ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. BORDEN, INCORPORATED v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Perry v. First Citizens National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API