Legal Opinion

Jobbers Overall Co. v. C. S. Hollister Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStagy, J.

Plaintiff’s agent secured from tbe defendant a paperwrit-ing purporting to be an unconditional order for certain overalls to be shipped by plaintiff to defendant. Tbe writing contained tbe following stipulation: “This contract is not subject'to cancellation unless delivery is delayed beyond a reasonable length of time.” There is no contention of any delay in delivery.

Defendant denied liability and, upon tbe trial, offered to sbow that tbe order in question was given witb tbe distinct understanding and upon tbe express condition tbat tbe same should not become effective or operative if certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. PowersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Ray v. . BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. Summit Avenue Building Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Exum v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Exum v. . LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Bailey v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API