Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lerner Shops v. . Rosenthal

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1945PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSchenck, J.

(Pertinent facts are stated in the opinion.) The plaintiff brought this action to compel the specific performance of a contract for the lease of certain real estate of the defendant, located at the northwest intersection of Fayetteville and Hargett Streets in the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. The plaintiff set up in his pleading an option signed by the defendant, offering to lease the property at the stipulated terms, and acceptance by the plaintiff.

The defendant admitted that he signed and delivered the option, and, in due time, received notice in writing of the acceptance and intention…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Gaylord v. GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Wilson v. PowersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  4. Gaylord v. . GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Perry v. First Citizens National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Roberson v. SwainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Darden v. HoutzDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API