Moe v. Springfield Milling Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Norman and Genevieve Moe appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their personal injury claims against Springfield Milling Corporation for dioxin poisoning traceable to a cattle feed supplement. The trial court decided the absence of an established dioxin level in humans and appellant’s failure to show with reasonable medical certainty a dioxin-related injury to Moe removed all questions of material fact. We believe a causal connection establishing a question of material fact has been demonstrated regardless of the nature of dioxin’s background level in the human…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Murphy v. Country House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Peterson v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Tapemark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Bondy v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Jonathan v. KvaalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Zimprich v. Stratford Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Jonathan v. KvaalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987