Legal Opinion

Jonathan v. Kvaal

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 31, 1987No. C6-86-1456Published

1Opinion of the Court

403 N.W.2d 256 (1987)

Dale Wayne JONATHAN, Appellant,

v.

Daniel R. KVAAL, Doughboy Recreational, Respondents.

No. C6-86-1456.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 31, 1987.

Review Denied May 20, 1987.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1987.

Leo F. Feeney, Corey L. Gordon, Robins, Zelle, Larson & Kaplan, St. Paul, for appellant.

James A. Reding, Richard S. Stempel, Reding & Votel, St. Paul, for Kvaal.

Paul C. Kunert, Sahr, Kunert & Tambornino, Minneapolis, for Doughboy Recreational.

Before Heard, considered and decided by the full court sitting en banc.

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This case arises from a swimming pool…

Also in this document: Dissent · Wozniak; Dissent · Forsberg.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API