Legal Opinion

Brunette v. Idaho Veneer Company

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1963No. 8990PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Plaintiff (respondent) was the owner of ranch and timber land near Newman Lake, Washington. In the fall of 1958 he employed one Ludwig to work on the property. Plaintiff testified that he agreed to pay Ludwig $100 per month and to give him the use of a house on the property, with lights, fuel and transportation furnished by the employer; that Ludwig agreed to take care of a few animals on the property, cut Christmas trees, and later to cut and skid logs; that then “we would hire a truck in which to haul;” that Ludwig was not authorized to haul or sell any logs; that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Klam v. KoppelIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Chamberlain v. the Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Plummer v. KingsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ulen v. KnecttleWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Federal Land Bank v. McCloudIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clements v. JungertIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Killinger v. IestIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Twin Falls Livestock Commission Co. v. Mid-Century InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Hausam v. SchnablIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Hieb v. Minnesota Farmers UnionIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API