Legal Opinion

Hausam v. Schnabl

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1994No. 20913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court determining that John and Patricia Schnabl were not liable for money borrowed from the appellant, Neal Hausam, by the Schnabl’s son, Wade, while Wade was managing his father’s business. We hold that the district court erred in concluding that there was no unjust enrichment in this case. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for entry of judgment in favor of Hausam.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In October 1988, John Schnabl (John) established RW Logging as a sole proprietorship and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rutter v. McLaughlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Brower v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Continental Forest Products, Inc. v. Chandler Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Dawson v. MeadIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Bailey v. NessIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hayden Lake Fire Protection District v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Stevenson v. Windermere Real Estate/Capital Group, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Erickson v. FlynnIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Alcala v. Verbruggen Palletizing Solutions, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API