Legal Opinion

Killinger v. Iest

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1967No. 9619PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Appellant has appealed from a judgment of involuntary dismissal of his action directed against respondents, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Appellant operates an electric appliance repair shop in Twin Falls. Respondent lest resides in Parma; he owns a farm situated north of Shoshone, herein referred to as the Shoshone farm. Respondent Tadlock was Iest’s tenant under an oral lease of the Shoshone farm.

Appellant alleged in his complaint that Tadlock, as tenant and agent of lest, “engaged” appellant to furnish and install an electric irrigation pump on the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Coe v. EsauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Hutchings v. CobbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Shaver v. BellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Lois Grunow Memorial Clinic v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Clark v. GneitingIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Furness v. ParkIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Idaho Title Co. v. American States Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Patino Ex Rel. Richardson v. Grigg & Anderson FarmsIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API