Legal Opinion

State v. . Harris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The case states that the defendant prayed an appeal to the Supreme Court, and, "upon filing his affidavit of his inability to give security for the cost of the appeal," was allowed to appeal in formapauperis. These are almost the very words used in S. v. Jones, 93 N.C. 617, in which the motion of the Attorney-General to dismiss was allowed. The subject is discussed and this precedent is followed in the late case of S. v. Jackson, 112 N.C. 849. Had the recital been simply that, "upon affidavit filed," the defendant is allowed to appeal without giving bond, there would perhaps have been a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. State v. . PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. State v. MarshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Honeycutt v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Gorham v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. McIntire v. . McIntireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Hanna v. . TimberlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Gorham v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API