Gorham v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Staoy, O. J.
Tbe burden of tbe petition to rebear is tbat tbe Court bas misinterpreted tbe record, or, if not, tbe record should be corrected and clarified to make it speak tbe truth, and as tbus amended,' reconsidered. In its initial allegation tbe petition is not unlike tbe one filed in Cook v. Mfg. Co., 183 N. C., 48, 110 S. E., 608. Beyond tbis tbe analogy ceases.
First. Exception is taken to tbe bolding tbat tbe theory of tbe trial precluded any consideration on appeal of whether tbe case was one for tbe jury on tbe issue of accidental death or death through accidental means, and to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Shipp Ex Rel. Shipp v. United Stage Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Hedgecock v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- State v. . DeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Walker v. . BurtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Franks'willSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Wolfe v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960