Legal Opinion

State v. . Rhodes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

MotioN to re-iiistate the appeal dismissed at this term. (See State v. Rhodes, supra).

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.;

This is a motion to re-instate this appeal, which was dismissed for failure to comply with the requirements for perfecting an appeal in forma pauperis. As repeatedly pointed out by the Court there must be some regulations of some kind for perfecting appeals to this Court. What those regulations shall be the Legislature has prescribed. When they are not observed by appellants the opposite party may have the appeal dismissed. Otherwise the statute would be a vain thing and there would be no orderly method of bringing up appeals. Every case would be the subject of debate.

The appellant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Smithwick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. State v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API