Legal Opinion

State v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 1910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Long, J., at March (Special) Term, .1910, of Foesyth.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee CubiaM.

The affidavit to appeal in forma pauperis is fatally defective, as it omits the averment that it is made “in good faith,” which is required by Rev., 3278. The appeal must be dismissed on motion as a'matter of right, not of discretion. S. v. Harris, 114 N. C., 830; S. v. Rhodes, 112 N. C., 856; S. v. Jackson, ib., 849; S. v. Shoulders, 111 N. C., 637; S. v. Wylde, 110 N. C., 500; S. v. Tow, 103 N. C., 350; S. v. Moore, 93 N. C., 500; S. v. Payne, ib., 612; S. v. Jones, ib., 617; S. v. Morgan, 77 N. C., 510; S. v. Divine, 69 N. C., 390, cited and approved. S. v. Bramble, 121 N. C.,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. . WyldeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. State v. . KeeblerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  4. State v. . Divine and AnotherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  5. State v. Atkinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. . StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Powell v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. State v. . MarionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API