Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Halliburton-Cohen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2005No. 2004-1808PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Kim M. Halliburton-Cohen of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0023389, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1982. On January 30, 2002, we suspended respondent’s license to practice for one year for professional misconduct, including failure to timely account for and return client funds, but we stayed the suspension on conditions. See Columbus Bar Assn. v. Halliburton-Cohen, 94 Ohio St.3d 217, 2002-Ohio-640, 761 N.E.2d 1040. As one condition of the stay, respondent was placed on a monitored probation.

{¶ 2} On December 16, 2003, relator, Columbus Bar…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. SchramOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. SchultzOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Halliburton-CohenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. OkochaOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. SchultzOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. SeibelOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. MartoranaOhio Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API