Legal Opinion

Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. Martorana

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 2013No. 2011-2028PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Kim Gerette Martorana, of Auburn Township, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0060109, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1992. In an 11-count first amended complaint, relator, Geauga County Bar Association, alleged that Martorana violated five Rules of .Professional Conduct as a result of her connections with a paralegal support company and out-of-state counsel and two additional rules as a result of charging excessive and nonrefundable fees in five client matters. The parties initially submitted a consent-to-discipline agreement in which Martorana stipulated to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Dayton Bar Assn. v. ParisiOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Trumbull County Bar Ass'n v. RuckerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. RandolphOhio Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Assn. v. AduseiOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. Amaddio and Wargo (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Columbus Bar Association v. Midian.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API