Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Schultz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1994No. 1994-1796PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 71 Ohio St.3d 383.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. SCHULTZ ET AL. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Schultz,

1994-Ohio-46.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Two-year suspension with one year suspended on condition that attorney satisfactorily complete one year of supervised probation—Charging an illegal or excessive fee—Failure to return unearned fee—Withdrawal from representation without taking reasonable steps to avoid foreseeable prejudice to client—Attempting to limit liability to client for malpractice—Representation of clients whose…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fox & Assocs. Co. v. PurdonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BallOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. SchultzOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. SchultzOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Halliburton-CohenOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. KlosOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. OkochaOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. SchwartzOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API