Schwartz Supply Co. v. Breen
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JANVIER, Judge.
Schwartz Supply Company, Inc., claims from A. L. Fishman, a contractor, and Morris Breen, the owner of certain prop erty which Fishman undertook to improve, $165.77, representing the alleged balance due for certain materials furnished by plaintiff to Fishman and used by him in carrying out the contract for improvements. Fishman makes no serious defense to the claim, but contends that such amount as may be due is due by Breen, and he calls Breen in warranty and prays for judgment against him for such sum as he, Fishman, may be required to pay to plaintiff. Breen, answering the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hortman-Salmen Co. v. NaquinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Houeye v. HenkelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Holliday v. MarionneauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845
- Swilley v. LowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schwartz Supply Co. v. BreenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Oak Appliance Co. v. ClaytonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941