Legal Opinion

Schwartz Supply Co. v. Breen

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1938No. 17049PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

Though the facts out of which this litigation arose have been heretofore stated when we considered the matter for the first time (179 So. 626), we deem it advisable to restate the controlling facts in order that there may be a clear understanding of our views concerning the relationship between the furnisher of supplies and the building owner for whose building the contractor purchases supplies and materials.

Morris Breen, having decided to have made certain repairs and improvements to a building owned by him, let the work ■to a contractor, A. L. Fishman. Fishman purchased…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Parks v. HallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Hortman-Salmen Co. v. NaquinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Edwards Bros. v. BernerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. Carolina Portland Cement Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. George E. Breece Lumber Co. v. MorrisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rancatore v. EvansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Adams v. RossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Switzerland General Ins. v. RoeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Garner v. VaughnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Hanover Insurance Co. v. Caruso-Simoneaux Agency, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API