Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Marionneaux

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Iberville, Deblieux, J. cited Civil Code, art. 379. 5 Mart. N. S., 651. 19 La. 384.

1Opinion of the CourtMorphy, J.

The defendant, sued as the drawer of a promissory note, pleaded, and, on the trial, showed, that he was a minor at the time of its execution. The plaintiff proved that the maker was engaged in trade when he signed the note, and that it was given in relation to such trade; but he adduced no evidence of his having been previously emancipated. The court below gave a judgment of non-suit. The plaintiff’s counsel moved for a new trial, and, in support of his motion, made oath that the defendant had been lawfully married more than four months before he made the note sued on, and that he (the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atkins v. Dixie Fair Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  2. Webre v. ChristSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Lee v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  4. Schwartz Supply Co. v. BreenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API