Houeye v. Henkel
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Action by Arthur Y. Houeye against James P. Henkel and others. Judgment for defendants was affirmed by the Court of Appeal, and plaintiff applies for certiorari or writ of review.
1Opinion of the CourtProyosty, J.
Plaintiff sues for a balance alleged to be due for goods sold on a credit to defendant during the year 1902. Defendant pleaded the general denial; and then, by a supplemental answer, payment. Defendant testified that during the year 1902, he would at the end of each month give his wife money to pay the account of the month at plaintiff’s store, and that he knows the payments were made because he saw the receipts. His wife, who was permitted to testify in the quality of his agent, testified that during 1902 she had at the end of each month paid the account of the month.
Defendant objected to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sleet v. SleetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harman v. LegrandeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Electrical Supply Co. v. Eugene Freeman, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Milam's Spot Cash Wholesale House v. NomeyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Rasch v. PetersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Schwartz Supply Co. v. BreenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.