Legal Opinion

Rufener v. Scott

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1955No. 32871PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwellenbach, J.

June 24, 1948, Wilber Scott purchased a hay dehydrator from Heil Company, the manufacturer of the machine. The company furnished a book of instructions relating to the particular piece of equipment and also gave Scott personal instruction in the operation of the machine. He used the equipment to do custom hay drying. September 12, 1949, Scott was operating the machine on the farm of Elmer Rufener and was blowing the dried hay into Rufener’s barn. During the operation, a fire broke out in the barn. The barn, some adjacent buildings, farm equipment, livestock, and hay were destroyed. Rufener…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. GorianskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Macdonald v. FraterWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Duncan v. JudgeWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Alaska Steamship Co. v. Pacific Coast Gypsum Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Braley Motor Co. v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bordeaux v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Matter of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Owens v. KuroWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Henderson v. Bardahl International Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1967

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API