Legal Opinion

Kuykendall v. Lambert

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1918No. 8105PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Alfalfa County ; .Tamos B. Cullison, Judge. Action by Sam C. Lambert and Lena Lambert against Ora L. Kuykendall. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrett, J.

In this case, the Lamberts, defendants in error, sued Kuykendall, plaintiff in error, for $1.000, the alleged purchase price of a certain jack. The gist of the defense of Kuykendall, defendant below, was that one of the plaintiffs below, Sam C. Lambert, sold the jack in question to on© Vennum, and that subsequently he (Kuyken-dall) purchased the jack from Vennum, and paid him the purchase price in full, and therefore was not indebted to Lambert in any sum for the jack. He pleaded and attached to his answer a receipt from Lambert to Vennum, acknowledging that Ven-num had paid Lambert in full…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Comptoir D'Escompte De Paris v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Noe v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Milos v. CovacevichOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. St. Louis, Ft. Scott & Wichita Railroad v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Oklahoma Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Young v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Baker v. PierceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. FinchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Holbird v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API