Legal Opinion

Queen v. Penske Corp.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided October 11, 2005No. I.C. NO. 294844Published

1Opinion of the Court

The undersigned reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Taylor. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Taylor.

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS

1. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Parsons v. Pantry, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Pittman v. Thomas & HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Pomeroy v. Tanner MasonryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Poe v. Raleigh/Durham Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API