Legal Opinion

Poe v. Raleigh/Durham Airport Authority

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1995No. COA94-1425PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Plaintiff Dan Pope is a fifty-two (52) year oid man with a fifth grade education and a learning disability. Because of his lack of education and cognitive problems, plaintiff has a severely restricted vocational status.

Plaintiff began working for defendant RDU in 1985, in defendant’s janitorial and maintenance department. On 3 May 1988, plaintiff suffered an admittedly compensable injury to his lower back, by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with defendant RDU. As a result of the May 1988 incident, plaintiff was not able to work from 5 May 1988…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ard v. Owens-IllinoisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Coppley v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Spears v. Betsy Johnson Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Coppley v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Queen v. Penske Corp.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API