Legal Opinion
Howe v. City of St. Cloud
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 19, 1994No. C3-93-1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellants Jeff and Jim Howe sued the City of St. Cloud for wages they lost because they took military leave. The Howes argue that the district court erred in granting summary judgment for St. Cloud on their wage claims because the military leave act requires that they not lose pay because of their military service. Minn.Stat. § 192.26 (1990). We reverse and remand to allow the district court to calculate the wages owed to the Howes.
FACTS
Appellants Jeff and Jim Howe are brothers who work for the respondent City of St. Cloud as firefighters. St. Cloud schedules its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass'n v. AubryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lanehart v. HornerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Schumacher v. IhrkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nathan Miller v. City of Indianapolis and Indianapolis Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Koppin v. StrodeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Boelter v. City of Coon RapidsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Hall v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Keeley v. Loomis Fargo & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.