Legal Opinion
Hall v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 2003No. S-02-578PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.
NATURE OF CASE
In this appeal, we are asked to interpret the term “workday” for purposes of military leave found in Neb. Rev. Stát. § 55-160 (Reissue 1998).
BACKGROUND
Appellant, Jerome M. Hall, is a firefighter for the Omaha Fire Department and at all times relevant to this appeal, served as a military reservist. As a member of the reserves, Hall was entitled to paid military leave under § 55-160, which at the time this case was filed, provided in relevant part:
All employees, including elected officials of the State of Nebraska, or any political subdivision thereof, who shall be members of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zavala v. ConAgra Beef Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- No Frills Supermarket, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications, LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- First Data Corp. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REV.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Drake v. DrakeNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rauscher v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Guardianship of LarsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Chase 3000, Inc. v. NEBRASKA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Blackburn v. Daufuskie Island Fire DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Renter v. SiedenburgNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.