Legal Opinion

Indianapolis Indiana Aamco Dealers Advertising Pool v. Anderson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 2001No. 48A02-0005-CV-282PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellant, Indianapolis Indiana Aameo Dealers Advertising Pool (Ad Pool), challenges the trial court's judgment in favor of appellees Joseph Anderson (Joseph), Matt Anderson (Matt), and Colonial Renting and Leasing, Inc. (Colonial). Ad Pool presents four issues upon appeal, which we restate as: (1) whether the trial court erred in concluding Joseph received a reasonably equivalent value in return for the release of a loan owed to him by Colonial; (2) whether the trial court erred by failing to make findings regarding Joseph's solvency at the time the loan was released;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Indianapolis Indiana AAMCO Dealers Advertising PoolIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Lee's Ready Mix & Trucking, Inc v. CreechIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. J.A.C. ex rel. Colter v. KoenigIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Diss v. Agri Business International, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. R.P.D. ex rel. DickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leonard v. Coolidge (In Re National Audit Defense Network)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2007
  2. Pathfinder Communications Corp. v. MacYIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Weiss v. HarperIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Bussing v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Glentel, Inc. v. Wireless Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API