Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Harper

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2004No. 49A02-0212-CV-1010PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

In 1991, Warren and Maureen Harper entered into a home improvement contract *203with Weiss & Company, Inc. ("Weiss")1 Upon completion of the project, the Har-pers experienced water leaks and damage to the interior of their home. The Har-pers filed a complaint against Weiss in Marion Circuit Court alleging in part they had suffered damages due to Weiss' poor workmanship and home improvement fraud. After a bench trial the trial court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law, in which it awarded to the Harpers compensatory damages in the amount of $157,651.04. Weiss filed a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Perez v. United States Steel Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Van Winkle v. NashIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Willett v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Gunderson v. RondinelliIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Smith v. WashingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wickens v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Nance v. Miami Sand & Gravel, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Smyth v. HesterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Bowyer v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Walton v. Claybridge Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API