Legal Opinion

Burgin v. Universal Credit Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1940No. 27549PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, sought recovery for personal injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon them by the defendants while forcibly and unlawfully attempting to repossess an automobile in the possession of the plaintiffs under a contract of conditional sale. Two causes of action are set out in the complaint; one for injuries to the husband, a second for injuries sustained by the wife. A jury’s verdict awarded the plaintiffs $6,560 for injuries sustained by the husband, as alleged in the first cause of action, and made no award of damages on account of injuries alleged to have…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McHugh v. McHughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Gallamore v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. ConstantineWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Pryor v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Webster v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wright v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Stone MacHinery Co. v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Jackson v. Peoples Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. Ragde v. Peoples BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Faircloth v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API