Faircloth v. Old National Bank
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
This appeal raises for the first time in Washington the question whether the Uniform Commercial Code provision authorizing self-help repossession of collateral without notice or hearing (RCW 62A.9-503) 1 violates due process. In our view it does not.
Appellant bought an automobile, financing the purchase by way of a security agreement whereby the seller retained a security interest in the automobile and appellant was to make monthly payments. The agreement was subsequently assigned for value to respondent Old National Bank. Appellant failed to make the first payment due, which placed him in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Reitman v. MulkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Adams v. Southern California First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- King v. South Jersey National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Kennebec, Inc. v. Bank of the WestWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Mount Vernon Dodge, Inc. v. Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- USA I Lehndorff Vermoegensverwaltung GmbH & Cie v. Cousins Club, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Maas v. Corporation of Gonzaga UniversityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.