Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Cruz
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 26, 2013No. 11-12568, 11-12441PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
We address two Sentencing Guidelines issues which are questions of first impression in this Circuit. First, Jose and Li-sandra Cruz assert the district court erred in enhancing their sentences under U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(10), 1 for the use or possession of device-making equipment as they were already subject to a two-year mandatory sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A for aggravated identity theft. 2 Jose and Lisandra contend the possession of device-making equipment was part of the “relevant conduct” for their 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2) offenses of defrauding by using an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Flores-Figueroa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. AbdelshafiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Jenkins-WattsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Cora Cadia FordCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Jean Baptiste CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Rodrequist WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Xavier TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Juan Fletcher GordilloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.