Legal Opinion
Held v. McNett
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 18, 1959No. 2430PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Acting Judge.
Appeal from an order quashing an attachment and releasing funds claimed by husband and wife as estate by entireties.
Plaintiffs sued Howard McNett and his partner Iverson. On the allegation that McNett was a non-resident an attachment before judgment was issued, and interrogatories were directed to a title company which was handling a sale of real estate belonging to McNett and his wife. Mr. and Mrs. McNett moved to quash the attachment on the ground that they owned the real estate as tenants by the entirety, and that the proceeds of the sale were indivisible and not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brell v. BrellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
- Campagna v. CampagnaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Settle v. SettleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
- Tait v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Sheldon v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Wall.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Roberts & Lloyd, Inc. v. ZyblutDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Finley v. ThomasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Gustin v. StegallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Lo Medico v. SimkowitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.