Legal Opinion

Lo Medico v. Simkowitz

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1960No. 2482PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellants brought this suit alleging that they had performed work on property owned by appellees, that full payment was not made for labor and materials furnished, and, accordingly, that money was due them. A default judgment was entered against ap-pellees. The judgment against M.rs. Simko-witz, hereafter referred to as the wife, was then set aside and trial was had on her liability only. At the conclusion of appellants’ case, the trial court dismissed the suit against her, and this is the first problem on appeal. The judgment against Mr. Simkowitz, hereafter referred…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Held v. McNettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. National Tire Dealers & Retreaders Ass'n v. G. D. C. Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Chesser v. TroianoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Rheam v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warner Corporation v. Magazine Realty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Kennedy v. District-Realty Title Insurance Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Tenants of 1460 Euclid Street v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API