Legal Opinion
Kropfelder v. Snap-On Tools Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 10, 1994No. K-94-867PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, Senior District Judge:
Plaintiff began working for defendant Snap-on in 1979 as a stockroom warehouseman in defendant’s Baltimore area warehouse which received and sent goods from and into interstate commerce. According to Snap-on’s 1993 letter to shareholders, 1 “the foundation of Snap-on [Tools]” is “direct sales [of tools] to professional technicians in automotive service” through mobile dealer vans. In 1986, plaintiff was promoted to warehouse manager and signed an employment agreement with defendant. That agreement did not contain an arbitration clause. Defendant…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Margaret Palcko v. Airborne Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Asplundh Tree Expert Company v. Robert E. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Lorntzen v. Swift Transportation, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Durkin v. CIGNA Property & Casualty Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.