Legal Opinion
Margaret Palcko v. Airborne Express, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 18, 2004No. 03-2227PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
The principal questions before us on this appeal are the scope of the exclusion from the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16 (2004), for a “class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” and the preemptive effect, if any, of the statutory exclusion.
I
Defendant Airborne Express, Inc. (“Airborne”) appeals from the District Court’s order dated April 23, 2003 denying Airborne’s motion to compel arbitration of ■plaintiff Margaret Palcko’s claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (2004), and the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Jack Ehleiter v. Grapetree Shores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Somerset Consulting, LLC v. United Capital Lenders, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Jaswinder Singh v. Uber Technologies IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Bernadean Rittmann v. amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.