Cate v. Holcomb

DAVIS, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellee sued defendant-appellant for personal injuries received by ap-pellee as the result of an accident while appellee was riding in a truck being operated by appellant. Trial was to a jury, which answered the special issues in favor of appellee. Judgment was entered accordingly, and the appellant has perfected his appeal. He brings forward 13 points of error.

By his first 5 points of error appellant contends the trial court erred in rendering judgment against him because: 1. Ap-pellee failed to meet the burden of proof that he did not occupy the status of a guest…