Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fernandez v. Kiesling

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1973No. 15096Published

1Dissent

CADENA, Justice.

I do not agree that prior Texas decisions establish the “rule” that it is proper to instruct the jury that, in order to find that a passenger in an automobile is not a “guest” withing the meaning of our guest statute, Article 6701b, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann., it is necessary to find that the compensation *937paid by the passenger was the motivating cause for furnishing the transportation. The prior Texas decisions do not establish such a rule simply because they have not previously considered the problem to which the majority opinion holds such “rule” applicable.

The instant case is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Raub v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Whitmore v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Rogers v. VreelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API